One of the problems of environmental protection bureaus in public nuisance event processing is failure of arriving at the scene at the first time. Therefore, the project aims to speed up the efficiency of evidence collecting. We planned some mechanisms to make sure evidence collecting more efficiently. The first work item of the project is to analyze the evidence collection abilities of local environmental protection bureaus in public nuisance events. We selected six public nuisance prone counties and planned resource questionnaire for public nuisance event processing. The questionnaire was used to analyze equipments, resource allocation status, response mechanisms and process integrity of local environmental protection bureaus. Then we invited experts from related areas and visited six selected local environmental protection bureaus to evaluate the public nuisance processing ability and propose suggestions. The experts used What-If Analysis to conduct Risk Assessment of public nuisance events processing, used Q & A mode to list factors in failure of causality confirmation, and proposed suggestions for improving current situation and actions to be taken. Some results from the work items are: 1) most local environmental protection bureaus often face problems of restricted funds and manpower, and deeply rely on commissioned firms, and further education and training are necessary for strengthening the abilities of bureaus staffs; 2) the project provided helps to Yunlin Environmental Protection Bureau in promoting populace self-evidence collection in order to reduce irrational behaviors of populace and promote appropriate methods of processing public nuisance events. The second work item of the project is to maintain and upgrade public nuisance dispute information management system. The system contains several functions such as: public nuisance disputes and identification information inquiry, public nuisance cases inquiry, public nuisance cases management and data download etc. The project established 40 public nuisance events processing related sites and manuals, information of public nuisance related units, information of 78 experts from different areas, information of public nuisance identification units. The system filters lacked information in the established cases and send e-mail to local government each quarter, in order to preserve the validity and grasp the progress of the cases. The third work item of the project is to analyze the integrated mechanism of public nuisance evidence collection and environmental pollution response. In order to synchronize the public nuisance evidence collection and environmental pollution emergency response process, the project collected current foreign and domestic mechanisms, analyzed the time points and work divisions of environmental pollution emergency response process in getting involve to each evidence collection step. We hold several meetings and collected opinions of local environmental protection bureaus to ensure the feasibility of synchronizing two operations. The project initially completed the integrated mechanism of public nuisance evidence collection and environmental pollution emergency response process, local bureaus need to set up the information sharing platforms, collect events information and inform central Environmental Protection Administration in order to deal with the events properly. The fourth work item of the project is to accelerate evidence collection efficiency. In order to enhance the effectiveness of dealing with pollution incidents; we provided recommendations for some events. We also designed the box containing equipments for evidence and held three meetings to discuss suitability of that . The fifth work item of the project is to improve the experience exchange of dealing with public nuisance events. We held a meeting on October to provide more experience sharing opportunities for local Environmental Protection Bureaus.

Public Nuisance;Public Nuisance Disputes;Public Nuisance Appraising